MechanismFigures — watch the workflow

Watch the idea become visible.

A reference-guided journey from scientific question to an inspectable figure.

MECHANISM/FIGURESIllustrated workflow · not a live agent run01 / 06

FOUR INPUTS. ONE EXPLANATORY QUESTION.

01Project contextWhat system are we studying?

02Mechanism or resultWhat changes—and why?

03Data & evidenceWhat can the figure honestly claim?

04Output constraintsWho reads it, and at what size?

DreamFusion · Poole et al. · ICLR 2023

THE FIGURE'S ONE JOB

Show what changes
and how the feedback reaches it.

Example reading of the published mechanism—not a new result.

RETURN TO THE SAME OBJECT

REVISE THE PICTURE, NOT THE SCORE

Could a reader tell
which object this update changes?

↶ Reinspect the return path

QUESTIONS BEFORE ACCEPTANCE

01Can the mechanism be traced
without the caption?

02Do the geometry and arrows
match the evidence?

03Does the actual-size render
meet the chosen references?

RELEASE POLICY, NOT A LIVE SCORE

90/100

Every dimension ≥ 4/5
Fidelity 5/5 · all hard gates pass

If it falls short, change the construction and review again.

A FIGURE IS NOT FINISHED WITHOUT ITS EVIDENCE

Published reference shown for calibration.
The files at right describe the required handoff.

SVG

Editable figureGeometry and labels you can refine

PNG

Actual-size previewInspect what the reader will see

Caption & scientific limitsWhat is shown—and what is not proved

SRC

Code & source evidenceReproduce the data-to-image mapping

JSON

Version-bound reviewClaims, image hashes, critique, revisions

The agent extracts one defensible relationship from your context, mechanism, evidence and output constraints.

Animation timeline0:00 / 1:00

Real reference figures. Editorial motion. No simulated agent results.

Read the walkthrough

Question. Start from project context, the scientific mechanism, actual evidence and output constraints. State one relationship the reader must see.
Study. Open two real approved figures. Record how their geometry, composition and annotation make the relationship visible.
Construct. Map that visual operation to the project's true entities and update. Here, attention follows DreamFusion's state, rendering, fixed evaluator and return update; this is a reading of a published example, not new research.
Critique. Test the rendered figure against its evidence, a captionless prediction and the chosen references. A score below the policy threshold triggers a revision, not an inflated evaluation.
Deliver. Provide an editable figure, final-size preview, caption, generating code/evidence and a review bound to those exact files.
Possibilities. Physical substrates, local-to-global dynamics, geometric computation and persistent correspondences are among the visual constructions the skill teaches. The displayed results belong to the original publication authors and are calibration targets, not outputs of the skill.